Wednesday, September 29, 2010

The Fountain - Darron Aranofksy (Spoilers, a lot of them)

"I'm ready to die" says Hugh Jackmen in one of the most astounding, last moments in a film called The Fountain.  He quickly climbs the tree that he's been traveling with into the dying star "xbulba". He leaps from its branches and floats out of the bubble of the tree, creating a separate space for himself.  He floats towards the imploding star, ready to rejoin his dead wife.  Everything in the surrounding area is sucked into nothingness, leaving total blackness in the endless space beyond him.  With an explosion, greater than almost anything I have witnessed on film, second only to 2001: A Space Odyssey, comes streaming warm colors tearing off Jackmans body, which has been blown back into a graceful arc.  Like a shooting star he hangs there as the tree, that is his wife, springs too life, plentiful with leaves and flowers.

Back on earth the star brightens in a middle of triangle, a shape seen throughout the film, placed in between the spires of the Aztec Temple.

In the snow Hugh Jackman looks at his wife's grave, not being able to bare with the fact that he could have saved her all along with bark from the tree of life.  He storms away unable to handle the funeral.

After the funeral he kneels down in his wife's grave, and starts digging madly until he pulls up some dirt.    He then delicately places a large seed over his wife, who is the tree.

The tree blossoms below Tom (Jackman) during the rebirthing of the star and souls of Tom and his wife.


(NO MORE SPOILERS!!!)

After watching this utterly astonishing film by Darren Aronofsky, I immediately wanted to start over and watch it again.  This movie is best seen first for it's sheer beauty.   Too be honest, it's old school methods for achieving the visuals through majority use of chemical reactions shot at extremely fast frame rates, and very close up, were more amazing than anything I've seen with just plain CGI (Although clearly CGI was at play for certain aspects of the movie).  On top of that, the graphic matching and varied, aesthetically pleasing shots were excellent in tandem with the great overlaps and composite images.

Another interesting facet of this film was its three paralleled story lines told completely out of sync with each other.

The Spanish conquistador nears his destination when he
met by an Aztec Guardian of the tree.
The one focusing on a 16th century conquistador from Spain tasked with finding the Tree of Life deep in its new territory (Aztec empire) in order to essentially make Spain immortal.

Another set in present day (approximately) where Tom is performing animal research in the hopes that he'll find a cure for a certain brain tumor that is growing inside of his wives skull.

The last (chronologically, not in the order of the movie) is an ambiguous time period.  The sleeve of the DVD said it's the future but there's no real
The snow globe-esque sphere that holds Tom Creo and his
wife approaches the center of the dying star Xbulba
proof of anything besides the fact that the same Tom from the previous story line, now bald and completely shaven, is floating in a snow globe esque sphere with a nearly dead tree and various plants growing inside of it approaching a space nebula known as "Xbulba".

Obviously these three are all connected through means which are hard to explain, but upon the first viewing, it is difficult to pick up on how they are joined as one narrative story.

Upon repeat viewings everything becomes much more clear, in most respects, making you appreciate its complex layout and interwoven stories even more so than the first viewing.

I could try to explain my theories on how it all fits together but it's best you come up with your own because that is the joy in watching movies such as these, putting together the pieces of the puzzle for yourself, then comparing your interpretations with others.

As all the movies I intend to write about, I would highly recommend watching this (or anything else by Darren Aronofsky) as soon as you can.

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Reflection - A Short by Sheridan Koehler and Blair Scott (Myself)

Here's a project that my fellow filmmaker Sheridan Koehler and I produced between the summer of our sophomore and junior year.  It has gone on to win numerous awards such as an Emmy Nomination for Dramatic Narrative, Official Selection at the National Film Festival for Talented Youth, Award of Excellence at the Northwest High School Film Festival, Winner at the Northwest Film Center, and it was featured in the One Reel Film Festival as part of Bumbershoot 2010.



Indee.tv - Reflection

Like most movies I enjoy, it's open to interpretation, please tell me yours!

Donnie Darko

For those of you that know me, you know that Donnie Darko is my favorite movie of all time, for those of you who have no idea who I am, you now know.

When I first saw this incredible film it was one of the most incredible experiences I had ever had watching anything really.  Reminiscent of the feeling I got once finishing Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey or his eerie The Shining (both of which I would recommend watching, if you haven't already).

For those of you who haven't seen the film, first let me say you should immediately find a copy and watch it.  I know it is on Netflix "Instant Que" but that may just be temporary.  If you have seen the film, please enjoy what I have to say about it and comment and discuss because that's what I'm here for!

Richard Kelly really knows how to wield a camera, one of, if not, the best young talents in Hollywood right now (although Donnie Darko was produced independently for only 4.5 million dollars).  From the opening dolly in on Donnie waking up in the middle of road coupled by the lens flare bringing in the title you know your in for a visual treat.

Frank talks to Donnie in the eerie bathroom scenes.
When I first watched this, to be honest, I was scared shitless at parts.  Some people ask me "How could you possibly be scared of a giant bunny?"  Let me say that when I watched this I was by myself in a pitch black basement that is already creepy enough.  But enough of me making excuses, this movie is legitimately scary at parts.  Making a giant bunny scary was quite a difficult task because at first glance, it sounds ridiculous, but Frank is everything but ridiculous.  Seeing him lingering slightly out of focus in the background of shots gives me the chills every time as well as the interesting voice work they did with James Duval.  Besides the metallic design of Frank's face, one of the most disturbing attributes were his movements.  I'm assuming they sped them up ever so slightly in post but that speeding up gives him a really unnatural feeling that is shocking to look at.  This is one of many strong points in the film.

One of my favorite sequences in the film is relatively early when the older kids hop out of the back of the bus at school.  The camera starts completely on its side disorienting the audience and rotates level as Donnie and his friends hop out of the back of the bus.  With Tears for Fears playing coming in as their feet hit the ground it instantly puts you in the 80's when the film is set.  Thankfully it was a faithful, and not ridiculous, portrayal of the 80's (although I wasn't yet born, it wasn't a stereotypical NEON EVERYWHERE sort of 80's setting, it was nice and subtle, unlike 2009's Hot Tub Time Machine, which is sort of a guilty pleasure of mine).  This sequence continues to flow between slow and fast tracking shots introducing essentially every character that has a role in the movie.  Kelly's combination of camera movement, slow motion smoothly alternating to normal speeds or even slightly sped up all in collaboration with the music sets a very surreal mood that is carried through out the movie.

I could go on and on about what I really liked about the film, but my favorite part is how much of it is up to interpretation it is.  I saw the Directors Cut before seeing the theatrical before the theatrical (which sounds like it was kind of a mistake because there is a decent amount of controversy from fans over which is better, personally I love both of them and can't really decide which I prefer) which has some scenes in here that I'm discussing that you may not have seen.  Both are incredible films, and rather different experiences seeing how essentially the "same movie".

My favorite scene, probably in all of cinema, is theatre scene followed by the talent show.  So much is going on that you must process and connect it's incredible.  The scene starts with a crane starting at the movies playing at the local cinema The Evil Dead and The Last Temptation of Christ.  Besides the fact that both of these movies were released in the 80's, Why are those movies even there? Why are they put together? Why does Donnie and Gretchen go to see the Evil Dead over The Last Temptation of Christ (aside from the fact it's a lame date movie)?

Frank and Donnie in the movie theater
These are all questions I have my own answers for but please, if you have a different idea, comment because there's rarely only ONE way to interpret these things, especially in a Richard Kelly film, he chooses his details very carefully.  The Last Temptation of Christ could be seen as foreshadowing for Donnie's act of self sacrifice in order to save the world at the end of the movie.  They may have chosen the Evil Dead because Frank shows up in the theater (the manipulated dead, I'm sure it wouldn't be too hard to describe as evil either).

Following the theater scene comes one of the finest cross cutting examples I've seen, although not immediately connected, both events are interlaced on a deeper level.  While Gretchen is conked out in the theater Donnie takes Frank's advice to "burn it to the ground" (referring to Jim Cunningham's, Patrick Swayze, house) while simultaneously at his Catholic school his sister is performing a rather provacative dance at a very young age.  Why are these two scenes cross cut?  My take is that because Cunningham is later revealed as a pervert (having a "kiddy porn dungeon"), burning his house while Donnie's younger sister is doing, as aforementioned, a provocative dance makes the cross cutting make perfect sense while giving it a much deeper meaning than "they're just happening simultaneously".

My teacher also brought up that the 80's was a place where the objectification of women began to take its roots.  Richard Kelly whom grew up in the 80's was adding another layer into his film in social commentary.  The whole love and fear "timeline" was also social commentary on lots of attitudes in the 80's that were very black and white.  The whole mindset that you were in control of everything, and everything depended on the individual is also brought up numerous times in the movie.

Donnie gazes off the Carpathian Ridge where he woke up at the beginning of the film, bringing things full circle as he uses the wormhole to travel back in time and effectively save the world by sacrificing himself.


Now on the the ending.  The ending is up to much debate.  The first time I watched this (directors cut) I was under the impression the whole thing was a dream because of the last chapter in the "Philosophy of Time Travel".  But after repeat viewings I'm under the impression that Donnie made a conscious decision to travel back in time so he could kill himself in order to prevent the world from entering a parallel universe hence saving it from total destruction. What are your thoughts on the ending?  Would you say that Frank was real, or just a hallucination caused by Donnie's schizophrenia?

This film opens up so many questions and not a whole lot are answered which leaves it wide open to interpretation.  Please feel free to comment and discuss!